An Investigation into the Muzzling of a Critical Profession
Introduction:
Once at the forefront of Hong Kong’s vibrant civil society, social workers are now finding themselves increasingly silenced. In recent years, concerns have been raised about the erosion of their freedom of speech and expression, particularly in the wake of the 2019 social unrest and the subsequent implementation of the National Security Law.
Muzzling of Dissent:
Social workers have traditionally played a vital role in advocating for the rights of the marginalized and vulnerable. However, in recent years, they have faced increasing pressure from authorities to toe the government line.
- In 2020, several social worker unions were disbanded after they publicly criticized the government’s handling of the pandemic and its crackdown on dissent.
- Individuals who expressed support for the pro-democracy movement have been targeted with investigations and suspensions.
- The Social Welfare Department has issued guidelines warning social workers to avoid engaging in political activities or expressing views that could undermine national security.
Chilling Effect:
These measures have created a chilling effect on the profession. Many social workers now fear speaking out or expressing critical views, for fear of reprisal. This has led to a decline in public discourse and a narrowing of the space for dissent in Hong Kong.
Impact on Service Delivery:
The muzzling of social workers has also had a detrimental impact on service delivery. Social workers play a crucial role in providing support to marginalized populations, such as the elderly, the disabled, and the poor. However, their ability to advocate for these individuals is becoming increasingly compromised.
Conclusion:
The silencing of social workers in Hong Kong is a serious concern that threatens the city’s civil society and the well-being of its most vulnerable citizens. It is essential that authorities respect the freedom of expression of all professionals, including those who work in the social welfare sector.
Only by encouraging open dialogue and dissent can Hong Kong maintain its vibrant and pluralistic society.
Kind regards
E. Thompson
