The federal judiciary is the third branch of the United States government and is responsible for interpreting and applying the law. The judiciary is composed of the Supreme Court, the federal courts of appeals, and the federal district courts. The number of judgeships in the federal judiciary has remained relatively stable in recent years, but there is now a growing movement to expand the number of judgeships.
Arguments for Expansion
There are several arguments in favor of expanding the number of judgeships in the federal judiciary. One argument is that the current number of judgeships is insufficient to handle the workload of the federal courts. The federal courts are currently facing a backlog of cases, and the average time it takes for a case to be resolved is increasing. Expanding the number of judgeships would help to reduce the backlog of cases and speed up the resolution of cases.
Another argument in favor of expanding the number of judgeships is that the current number of judgeships does not reflect the growing population of the United States. The population of the United States has increased by more than 100 million people since the last time the number of judgeships was expanded. As the population grows, the number of cases filed in federal court is also likely to increase. Expanding the number of judgeships would help to ensure that the federal courts have the resources they need to handle the growing caseload.
Arguments Against Expansion
There are also several arguments against expanding the number of judgeships in the federal judiciary. One argument is that expanding the number of judgeships would be too expensive. The federal government would have to pay for the salaries of the new judges, as well as for their staff and other expenses. Expanding the number of judgeships would also require the construction of new courthouses and other facilities.
Another argument against expanding the number of judgeships is that it would lead to a more politicized judiciary. The president would have the power to appoint the new judges, and the judges would be likely to reflect the president’s political views. This could lead to a more partisan judiciary, which would be less likely to make impartial decisions.
Conclusion
The debate over whether to expand the number of judgeships in the federal judiciary is likely to continue for some time. There are strong arguments on both sides of the issue. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to expand the number of judgeships will be up to Congress.
Kind regards
Dr. R. Hamilton
