The Case for Lijo
Ariel Lijo is a highly experienced and qualified judge who has served on the federal bench for over 20 years. He is well-respected by his colleagues and has a reputation for fairness and impartiality. Lijo is also a prolific scholar, having published numerous articles and books on legal topics.
Some of Lijo’s most notable accomplishments include:
* Presiding over the trial of former President Carlos Menem for corruption charges.
* Investigating the AMIA bombing, which killed 85 people in Buenos Aires in 1994.
* Serving as a member of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
Lijo is a strong advocate for human rights and has been praised for his work in this area. He is also known for his commitment to judicial independence and has spoken out against political interference in the judiciary.
Given his experience, qualifications, and commitment to justice, Lijo would be a valuable addition to the Supreme Court. He would bring a wealth of knowledge and expertise to the Court and would be a strong voice for human rights.
The Case Against Lijo
There are also some arguments against Lijo’s appointment to the Supreme Court. Some critics have accused him of being too closely aligned with the current government.
Others have questioned his impartiality, citing his past rulings in favor of the government in several high-profile cases.
Additionally, Lijo has been criticized for his lack of experience in certain areas of law, such as commercial law.
Conclusion
Lijo is a highly qualified and experienced judge who has a strong track record of protecting human rights. However, some critics have questioned his impartiality and his lack of experience in certain areas of law. Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to appoint Lijo to the Supreme Court is a matter for the President and the Senate to decide.
Kind regards E. Thompson.
